CORVUSAccounting & Tax
← Back to Blog

Accounting for IT Companies in Latvia

February 26, 2026

Latvia's IT sector contributed over EUR 2.8 billion to GDP in 2025, making it the fastest-growing segment of the economy and home to roughly 6,400 registered technology companies. Yet the accounting practices that serve a retail shop or a law firm will leave an IT company bleeding money through misclassified R&D expenses, botched stock option reporting, and payroll structures that ignore remote-work realities.

This guide walks through the accounting specifics that matter most for Latvian IT businesses — from how to treat development costs under local GAAP to structuring compensation for a distributed engineering team.

R&D Expense Treatment: Capitalize or Expense?

The question every CTO-turned-founder asks their accountant within the first year: "We spent EUR 120,000 building our platform — is that an asset or a cost?"

Under Latvian accounting standards (which align with the EU Accounting Directive for small and medium enterprises), development costs can be capitalized as intangible assets if they meet specific criteria:

  1. Technical feasibility is demonstrable — you have a working prototype or a clear technical specification.
  2. Intention to complete and use or sell the product exists.
  3. Ability to use or sell the asset is realistic.
  4. Future economic benefits are probable — there is a market or internal use case.
  5. Adequate resources exist to complete development.
  6. Costs can be reliably measured and separated from research-phase spending.

If any of these conditions is missing, the spending goes straight to the profit and loss statement as a period expense.

Here is the practical split most IT companies face:

  • Research phase (brainstorming, market analysis, feasibility studies): always expensed.
  • Development phase (coding, testing, building production systems): capitalizable if the criteria above are met.

Capitalized development costs must be amortized over their useful life, which Latvian practice typically sets at 3–5 years for software. VID (the State Revenue Service) will scrutinize amortization periods shorter than 3 years or longer than 10 years.

A common mistake? Capitalizing salaries of developers who split time between maintenance of existing products and building new features. You need time-tracking data to support the allocation. Without it, VID can reclassify the entire amount as a current expense — and if that changes your profit picture, the CIT implications follow.

Intellectual Property: Ownership, Licensing, and Transfer Pricing

Many Latvian IT companies create IP that ends up being used by related entities — a parent company in another EU country, or a subsidiary selling to a specific market. The transfer pricing rules under the Latvian Commercial Law and Cabinet Regulation No. 677 require that transactions between related parties occur at arm's length prices.

What this means in practice:

  • If your Latvian SIA develops software and licenses it to a related company in Germany, the royalty rate must reflect what an independent company would charge. The OECD's comparable uncontrolled price method is the most common approach.
  • Documentation requirements kick in when related-party transactions exceed EUR 250,000 per year. Below that threshold, you still need a defensible pricing policy — you just do not need the full transfer pricing file.
  • Royalty payments received by the Latvian entity are taxable income. Royalties paid abroad may be subject to withholding tax (typically 0–5% within the EU under double tax treaties, but verify treaty-by-treaty).

One structure we see frequently: a Latvian SIA owns the IP, licenses it to operating companies in other markets, and reinvests the royalty income — paying 0% CIT under Latvia's distributed-profit model. This is legitimate, but only if the Latvian entity has genuine substance (employees, office, decision-making authority). Shell structures trigger anti-avoidance provisions.

Employee Stock Options (ESOP)

Latvia introduced a favorable stock option regime in 2021, and it remains one of the more attractive ESOP frameworks in the EU. The key rules for 2026:

  • No tax event at grant — the employee owes nothing when options are granted.
  • No tax event at vesting — still nothing when options vest.
  • Tax at exercise/sale — the gain (difference between exercise price and fair market value at exercise, or sale price) is taxed as capital gains at 25.5% PIT, provided the options were held for at least 12 months.
  • If the holding period is less than 12 months, the gain is treated as employment income — subject to PIT at progressive rates (25.5% up to EUR 105,300, then 33%) plus social contributions.

The accounting side requires careful tracking:

  1. Fair value estimation at grant date. IFRS 2 / Latvian GAAP equivalent requires you to estimate the fair value of options at the grant date and recognize the expense over the vesting period. For startups, this usually means a Black-Scholes or simplified model — and yes, you need to document your assumptions.
  2. Equity reserve vs. liability classification. If the company settles in shares, the credit goes to equity. If there is a cash-settlement alternative, it may need to be classified as a liability and remeasured each period.
  3. Social contribution implications. When options are exercised within 12 months, the employer must pay social contributions (VSAOI) on the gain. At 23.59% employer rate, this can be a significant cost. Structure your vesting schedule to exceed 12 months.

Remote Teams and Cross-Border Payroll

A Rīga-based SIA with developers in Poland, designers in Portugal, and a product manager in Georgia — this is no longer unusual. It is the default structure for dozens of Latvian tech companies. The accounting implications are real:

Permanent establishment risk. If a remote employee in another EU country has the authority to conclude contracts on behalf of your Latvian SIA, you may trigger a permanent establishment in that country, creating corporate tax obligations there. A developer writing code does not typically create PE risk. A sales director signing deals in Germany probably does.

Payroll registration. Employees working in another EU member state for more than 183 days generally must be registered for social contributions in their country of residence. The A1 certificate (posted worker regime) can extend Latvian social contribution coverage for up to 24 months, but it requires an application to VSAA before the posting begins.

Contractor vs. employee classification. Using freelancers abroad avoids payroll complexity, but VID — and the tax authorities of the worker's country — may reclassify the relationship as employment if the contractor works exclusively for your company, uses your equipment, and follows your schedule. The reclassification triggers retroactive social contributions and penalties.

Cost allocation for R&D. If remote developers contribute to capitalizable R&D projects, their costs must be included in the capitalized amount — regardless of their location. This requires project-level time tracking across borders.

Typical IT Company Cost Structure and Tax Planning

An average Latvian IT company with EUR 500,000 in annual revenue shows a cost breakdown roughly like this:

  • Personnel costs (salaries + VSAOI): 55–65% of revenue
  • Cloud infrastructure (AWS, Azure, GCP): 5–12%
  • Software licenses and tools: 3–6%
  • Office and administration: 3–8%
  • Marketing and sales: 5–10%
  • Professional services (legal, accounting): 2–4%

The tax planning opportunities sit in the details:

  1. Maximize R&D capitalization where legitimate — it smooths your profit picture and defers tax on distributed profits.
  2. Cloud costs are fully deductible as operational expenses. No capitalization debate here, as long as you are renting compute, not building your own data center.
  3. Software subscriptions (SaaS tools) are period expenses. Perpetual licenses above EUR 1,000 may need to be capitalized and amortized.
  4. Employee training and conference costs are deductible if they relate to the company's business activities. Send your developers to a tech conference in Berlin? Deductible. Send them on a team-building trip to Ibiza? VID will have questions.
  5. Home office compensation for remote workers (up to EUR 30/month without documentation, or actual costs with documentation) is a deductible expense and non-taxable for the employee.

VAT for IT Services

Most B2B IT services are subject to the reverse-charge mechanism when provided to clients in other EU countries. The Latvian company issues an invoice without VAT, and the client self-assesses VAT in their country. This means Latvian IT companies selling primarily to EU businesses often have more input VAT (from local purchases) than output VAT — resulting in regular VAT refund claims.

VID processes refund claims within 30 days for established companies with clean histories, but new companies or those with unusually large refund claims may face extended review periods of 60–90 days. Cash flow planning should account for this.

For B2C digital services sold to consumers in other EU countries, the One-Stop Shop (OSS) mechanism applies. You register for OSS in Latvia and declare VAT on all EU consumer sales through a single quarterly return, rather than registering in every member state.

What IT Companies Get Wrong

After years of working with technology businesses in Latvia, the same mistakes repeat:

  • Mixing research and development phases without documentation, leading to the entire R&D claim being denied.
  • Ignoring transfer pricing for intercompany services, especially when the Latvian entity provides development services to a related foreign company at cost — VID expects an arm's length markup.
  • Failing to track stock option grants in the accounting system, then scrambling when an exercise event occurs.
  • Not registering remote workers in their home countries for social contributions, creating retroactive liabilities that can reach EUR 15,000–30,000 per employee.

A specialized accountant will not just record transactions — they will structure them to fit the regulatory framework from the start. If your IT company needs accounting that understands the difference between a sprint and a ledger, get in touch with our team.

Stay Updated on Tax Changes

Monthly digest of deadlines, rates, and tips

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.